Skip to content. | Skip to navigation

Personal tools
Sections
You are here: Home wiki WhatIsContentManagement

WhatIsContentManagement

What is Content Management? How is intended to be used, how is it actually used to communicate, share knowledge and support collaboration among groups of contributors working in different offices, locations, timezones, computing environments (and not only computers, including PDAs and phones, other devices)?

Many definitions of content management steer clear of making claims for being useful tools for managing presence, projects or collaboration. However our experience suggests that individuals and groups utilize content management tools to do these sorts of things. Groups develop their own special practices to adapt content management tools to the task of coordination, collaboration and some of the artefacts of management.

Industry and OSS groups are defining a content management market by positioning feature sets, describing needs and how they are satisfied by the tools they provide. Product feature sets are changing and evolving at a rapid pace, particularly among Open Source projects due to supply side scale factors which afford these projects the option of reusing other Open Source projects with compatibile licenses in new heterogeneous product assemblies. Considerable functional overlap is now observed {evidence?} between content management platforms (such as Plone), presence management platforms (IM style aps), and telecommunications platforms (such as Firefly or Skype). A convergence of functionality is predicted. Sites like cmsmatrix.org may provide normalizing forces driving groups to replicate features across platforms in a sort of feature-driven "arms race" which is used to differentiate and balance products against other products.

{comment on potential for network effects to be evident in these markets}

{comment on strength of lock-in /switching cost effects in these markets}

{comment on the trends towards /away from dominant standards, open standards vs closed standards, vs the pace of innovation}

{comment on the platform problem, defining the market base - PC, phone, PDA, other device; and potential for single or many market sponsors}

Content management frameworks

How should we evaluate CMS's

Various Content Management Platforms and Frameworks

!phpWebSite 0.9.3-3 http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?forum_id=376894

MediaWiki 1.3.1 http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?forum_id=399531

Tiki 1.8.3 -Polaris- http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?forum_id=381738

Back-End CMS http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?forum_id=377636

eGroupWare 1.0 RC5 http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?forum_id=371527

FSL and Open University Support System (OpenUSS?http://sourceforge.net/forum/?group_id=6259

Plone (of course) http://sourceforge.net/mail/?group_id=47214

Xaraya 0.9.10 PHP based http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?forum_id=404582

 


comments:

Let's assess evaluation tools now --aldo, Thu, 19 Aug 2004 16:32:52 +0100 reply
Is it about time to assess EvaluationTools? so we can compare these products?

BIE (Business Integration Engine) -- Wed, 25 Aug 2004 11:18:26 +0100 reply
Does the BIE (Business Integration Engine) qualify as a content management framework? (see http://www.brunswickwdi.com/bie)

What about Groove, for document review --ahiggins, Tue, 21 Sep 2004 09:59:31 +0100reply

What about Groove, for document review -- Tue, 21 Sep 2004 12:01:23 +0100 reply
You can find out about it at http://www.groove.net/

Comparisson of Business School presences --ahiggins, Wed, 23 Nov 2005 16:43:09 +0000 reply
http://www.tilburguniversity.nl/

http://www.lums.lancs.ac.uk/

http://www.bath.ac.uk/management/